From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adkins v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 17, 2006
2006 Ohio 4275 (Ohio 2006)

Summary

In Adkins, the sentencing entry did not contain any reference to postrelease control, and we, in effect, held that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to issue a nunc pro tunc entry adding postrelease control to the sentence after Adkins's original sentence had expired.

Summary of this case from Watkins v. Collins

Opinion

No. 2006-1478.

August 17, 2006.


In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon consideration of the petition and the return of writ,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the writ be granted and that the petitioner is immediately released based upon the court's decision in Hernandez v. Kelly, 108 Ohio St.3d 395, 2006-Ohio-126, 844 N.E.2d 301.


Summaries of

Adkins v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 17, 2006
2006 Ohio 4275 (Ohio 2006)

In Adkins, the sentencing entry did not contain any reference to postrelease control, and we, in effect, held that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to issue a nunc pro tunc entry adding postrelease control to the sentence after Adkins's original sentence had expired.

Summary of this case from Watkins v. Collins
Case details for

Adkins v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:Adkins v. Wilson

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Aug 17, 2006

Citations

2006 Ohio 4275 (Ohio 2006)
2006 Ohio 4275
852 N.E.2d 749

Citing Cases

Watkins v. Collins

{¶ 48} Petitioners' citation of Hernandez, 108 Ohio St.3d 395, 2006-Ohio-126, 844 N.E.2d 301, and Gensley,…

State v. Tyson

* * * The sentencing entries for petitioners Ivy and Ramey stated that `[following the defendant's release…