From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adcock v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 31, 1994
438 S.E.2d 910 (Ga. 1994)

Opinion

S93G1125.

DECIDED JANUARY 31, 1994.

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia — 208 Ga. App. 346.

Lanser, Levinson Paul, Adrian F. Lanser III, Christopher G. Paul, for appellant.

T. Joseph Campbell, District Attorney, for appellee.


Statements made by the appellant, Janice Adcock, during a hearing for temporary child support in a paternity action she brought against her biological father, who is also the biological father of her child, were subsequently used against her in a criminal prosecution for incest. For the reasons detailed in the dissent to the Court of Appeals decision, see Adcock v. State, 208 Ga. App. 346, 350-353 ( 430 S.E.2d 606) (1993) (Beasley, J., dissenting), we find that the self-incriminating statements made during the civil hearing were not voluntary and, therefore, should not have been admitted in the criminal trial. Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 ( 84 S.C. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908) (1964). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment reversed. Clarke, C. J., Hunt, P. J., Benham, Fletcher, Sears-Collins, Hunstein, JJ., and Judge Robert J. James concur. Carley, J., disqualified.


DECIDED JANUARY 31, 1994.


Summaries of

Adcock v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 31, 1994
438 S.E.2d 910 (Ga. 1994)
Case details for

Adcock v. State

Case Details

Full title:ADCOCK v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jan 31, 1994

Citations

438 S.E.2d 910 (Ga. 1994)
438 S.E.2d 910

Citing Cases

Adcock v. State

ANDREWS, Judge. Our judgment in this case at 208 Ga. App. 346 ( 430 S.E.2d 606) (1993) has been reversed by…