From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
May 18, 2015
Case No. 5:13-cv-210 KGB-JTR (E.D. Ark. May. 18, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 5:13-cv-210 KGB-JTR

05-18-2015

ANTONIO WRIGHT ADC # 148629 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT


JUDGMENT

Consistent with the Order that was entered in this matter on this date, the court dismisses with prejudice this case. The Court denies a certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.

SO ADJUDGED this 18th day of May, 2015.

/s/_________

Kristine G. Baker

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wright v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
May 18, 2015
Case No. 5:13-cv-210 KGB-JTR (E.D. Ark. May. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Wright v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO WRIGHT ADC # 148629 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: May 18, 2015

Citations

Case No. 5:13-cv-210 KGB-JTR (E.D. Ark. May. 18, 2015)

Citing Cases

Pafford v. Kelley

. If Pafford does not meet the “heavy burden” of satisfying Strickland, see United States v. Apfel, 97 F.3d…

Jackson v. Payne

. If Petitioner does not meet the “heavy burden” of satisfying Strickland, see United States v. Apfel, 97…