recognizing an exception to the requirement of current participation where it is alleged that but for the employer's conduct, the employee would be a participant
Summary of this case from Davis v. Bowman Apple Products Co. Inc.No. 94-2105.
October 2, 1995.
C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 44 F. 3d 650.
recognizing an exception to the requirement of current participation where it is alleged that but for the employer's conduct, the employee would be a participant
Summary of this case from Davis v. Bowman Apple Products Co. Inc.noting in reference to the DD-250 that the government "signs the form signifying acceptance and conformance of the goods"
Summary of this case from Quiles v. Sikorsky AircraftFull title:ADAMSON ET AL. v. ARMCO, Inc
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 2, 1995
U.S.S.G. § 1B1.1, comment. (n. 1(f)); cf. United States v. Cannon, 41 F.3d 1462, 1467 (11th Cir.) (defendant…
U.S. v. Halliburton CompanyThe Eleventh Circuit also addressed this issue and found that the DD-250 Form does not constitute a…