From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Uchtman

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
Sep 12, 2007
Case No. 04-cv-667-DRH (S.D. Ill. Sep. 12, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 04-cv-667-DRH.

September 12, 2007


ORDER


Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R R") (Doc. 13), issued by United States Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud, pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), denying a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), filed by Petitioner Adams pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The R R found no basis to grant the Petition and therefore denied relief.

The R R was sent to the parties with a notice informing them of their right to appeal by way of filing "objections" within ten days of service. The time period in which to file an objection has lapsed. Neither party has filed an objection. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) this Court need not conduct a de novo review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R R in its entirety. Larry Joe Adams's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adams v. Uchtman

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
Sep 12, 2007
Case No. 04-cv-667-DRH (S.D. Ill. Sep. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Adams v. Uchtman

Case Details

Full title:LARRY JOE ADAMS Petitioner, v. ALAN UCHTMAN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Illinois

Date published: Sep 12, 2007

Citations

Case No. 04-cv-667-DRH (S.D. Ill. Sep. 12, 2007)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Pfister

] Those arguments fall far short of suggesting bad faith. See Adams v. Uchtman, 2007 WL 2710486, at *7 (S.D.…