From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 28, 2021
321 So. 3d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-1677

07-28-2021

Ross Anthony ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED . See Owens v. State , 303 So. 3d 993 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (holding that section 948.06(2)(f)1., Florida Statutes, should be construed to require that a defendant meet all conditions listed in sub-subparagraphs a. through d. to qualify for application of subparagraphs 1. and 2.); Schmidt v. State , 310 So. 3d 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (holding that sub-subparagraph c. does not include defendants with more than one technical violation of probation).

B.L. Thomas, Kelsey, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Adams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 28, 2021
321 So. 3d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Adams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ross Anthony ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jul 28, 2021

Citations

321 So. 3d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)