From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. South British & Nat'l Fire & Marine Ins. Companies of New Zealand

Supreme Court of California
Jul 23, 1886
70 Cal. 198 (Cal. 1886)

Summary

In Adams v. Insurance Co., 70 Cal. 198, [11 P. 627], the contract was not like the policy here considered as it did not provide (so far as the opinion discloses) that the loss should be paid after the expiration of a certain time following the filing of proofs, etc., including appraisal if it should be required.

Summary of this case from Winchester v. North British Etc. Co.

Opinion

         Department One

         Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing a new trial.

         COUNSEL:

         The instruction requested by the defendant should have been given. (Old Saucilito L. & D. D. Co ., 66 Cal. 253; Holmes v. Richet , 56 Cal. 307; Elliott v. Royal Exchange Ins. Co ., L. R. 2 Ex. 241; Gauche v. London and Lancashire Ins. Co ., 11 Ins. Law J. 369.)

         T. C. Van Ness, for Appellant.

          Freeman & Bates, and Grove L. Johnson, for Respondents.


         JUDGES: Ross, J. McKinstry, J., and McKee, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          ROSS, Judge

         This is an action upon a policy of fire insurance wherein the defendants agreed that in case of the destruction of or damage to the property insured by fire they would pay to the plaintiffs the amount of such loss or damage, not exceeding the amount in the policy mentioned, "provided always that this insurance shall at all times and under all circumstances be subject to the following conditions and stipulations, which conditions and stipulations constitute the basis of this contract, and are to be considered as incorporated in and forming part of this policy."

Among the conditions and stipulations referred to are the following:

         " 4. In case of loss, the assured shall give immediate notice thereof, and shall render to the companies a particular account of said loss, under oath, stating the time, origin, and circumstances of the fire; the occupancy of the building herein described; other insurance, if any, and copies of the written portion of all policies; the whole cash value and ownership of the property, and the amount of loss or damage; and shall produce, if required, the certificate of the chief of the fire department, or his assistant (or if there be no such official, then the certificate under seal of a magistrate, notary public, or commissioner of deeds, doing business nearest the place of the fire), not concerned in the loss or related to the assured, stating that he has examined the circumstances attending the loss, knows the character and circumstances of the assured, and verily believes that the assured has without fraud sustained loss on the property herein described to the amount claimed by the said assured. The assured shall, if required, submit to examinations under oath either before or after furnishing the proofs herein required, by any person appointed by the companies, and shall answer all questions relating to the alleged loss or damage, and to their claims therefor, and subscribe to such examinations when reduced to writing; and shall also produce their books of account, invoices, and inventories, and other vouchers, and exhibit the same for examination at the office of the companies, and permit extracts and copies thereof to be made. The assured shall also produce certified copies of all bills and invoices the originals of which have been lost or destroyed; and shall also exhibit all that remains of the property which was covered by this policy, damaged or not damaged, for examination to any person or persons named by these companies. In no case shall the claim be for a greater sum than the actual damage to or cash value of the property at [11 P. 628] the time of the fire, nor shall the assured be entitled to recover under this policy any greater proportion of the loss or damage than the amount hereby insured bears to the whole sum insured on said property, whether the such other insurance be by specific or by general or floating policies. Assignors, unless the assignee owns the property, must make the proofs hereby required. And if there appear any fraud or false declaration, or that the fire shall have happened by the procurement or willful act, means, or connivance of the assured or claimants, or that the assured failed to use his best endeavors in saving and protecting the property from damage at and after the fire, he, she, or they shall be excluded from all benefit under this policy.

         " 5. In case differences shall arise touching any loss or damage, the matter shall, at the written request of either party, be submitted to two impartial appraisers, mutually chosen (who, in case of disagreement, shall choose a third), and whose detailed estimate, made in writing and signed by any two of them, under oath, shall, as to the amount of such loss or damage only, be binding on both parties, but shall not decide the liabilities of these companies on this policy."

         " 11. It is further expressly covenanted by the parties hereto that no suit or action for the recovery of any claim by virtue of this policy shall be sustained in any court until after an award shall have been demanded and obtained, fixing the amount of such claim in the manner above provided."

         The language of the stipulations brings the case within the principle of the case of Old Saucilito Land & D. D. Co. v. Commercial Union A. Co ., 66 Cal. 253, and of the cases there cited, on the authority of which the judgment and order in the present case must be reversed. Here, as it was in the Saucilito case, the clear meaning of the contract is, that if the amount of loss cannot otherwise be adjusted to the satisfaction of the parties, it shall be adjusted by the mode of arbitration therein prescribed, and that until such adjustment, or a fair effort on the part of the insured to obtain it, no cause of action arose.

         Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

Adams v. South British & Nat'l Fire & Marine Ins. Companies of New Zealand

Supreme Court of California
Jul 23, 1886
70 Cal. 198 (Cal. 1886)

In Adams v. Insurance Co., 70 Cal. 198, [11 P. 627], the contract was not like the policy here considered as it did not provide (so far as the opinion discloses) that the loss should be paid after the expiration of a certain time following the filing of proofs, etc., including appraisal if it should be required.

Summary of this case from Winchester v. North British Etc. Co.

In Adams v. South British & National Fire & Marine Ins. Co. (1886) 70 Cal. 198, the policy at issue provided for appraisal in case of dispute regarding loss or damage.

Summary of this case from Blackwell v. Foremost Ins. Co.
Case details for

Adams v. South British & Nat'l Fire & Marine Ins. Companies of New Zealand

Case Details

Full title:L. S. ADAMS et al., Respondents, v. SOUTH BRITISH AND NATIONAL FIRE AND…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 23, 1886

Citations

70 Cal. 198 (Cal. 1886)
11 P. 627

Citing Cases

Winchester v. North British Etc. Co.

" Our attention has been called to Old Saucilito etc. Co. v. Commercial etc. Co., 66 Cal. 253, [5 P. 232];…

Rives-Strong Bldg. v. Bk. of America

Similar decisions have been made in this and other states. ( Holmes v. Richet, 56 Cal. 307 [38 Am. Rep. 54];…