Opinion
May 7, 1999
Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Lunn, J. — Summary Judgment.
Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Balio, JJ.
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiffs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting that part of defendants' motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the causes of action for negligent and reckless infliction of emotional distress. With respect to negligent infliction of emotional distress, the underlying statutory duty pursuant to General Business Law § 395-b Gen. Bus.(2) is breached by the installation of the video camera; whether a plaintiff was actually videotaped is not an essential element of the offense ( see, Salamone v. Oak Park Marina, 259 A.D.2d 987). With respect to reckless infliction of emotional distress, it is likewise unnecessary to establish that a plaintiff was actually videotaped ( see, Salamone v. Oak Park Marina, supra; Harkey v. Abate, 131 Mich. App. 177, 346 N.W.2d 74).