From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Hiatt

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 9, 1949
173 F.2d 896 (3d Cir. 1949)

Opinion

No. 9838.

Argued February 7, 1949.

Decided March 9, 1949.

Appeal from the United States District Court for Middle District of Pennsylvania; Frederick V. Follmer, Judge.

See, also, 79 F. Supp. 433.

Oscar W.B. Reed, of Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Lt. Col. Nicholas R. Voorhis, of Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and O'CONNELL and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.


On Petition for Rehearing.


The petitioner has filed a petition for rehearing renewing his motion for substitution of Humphrey for Hiatt, Warden. It is unnecessary to pass on the question as to whether Humphrey may be substituted for Hiatt as succeeding warden of the United States Penitentiary at Lewisburg since the petitioner has been released by order of the United States Board of Parole and is no longer in custody. Weber v. Squier, Warden, 315 U.S. 810, 62 S.Ct. 800, 86 L.Ed. 1209. Cf. Anderson v. Corall, 263 U.S. 193, 44 S.Ct. 43, 68 L.Ed. 247. The cause being moot we dismissed the appeal. No cogent reason appearing for rehearing we will deny the petition.


Summaries of

Adams v. Hiatt

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 9, 1949
173 F.2d 896 (3d Cir. 1949)
Case details for

Adams v. Hiatt

Case Details

Full title:Albert A. ADAMS, Petitioner, v. W.H. HIATT, Warden, United States…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Mar 9, 1949

Citations

173 F.2d 896 (3d Cir. 1949)

Citing Cases

Parker v. Ellis

Had the case been argued, conceivably the petitioner would have urged upon the Court the writ-remedy…

Jones v. Cunningham

In each, as in Pollard, the custody requirement was unmentioned. United States ex rel. St. John v. Cummings,…