From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. George T. Cantrello, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1967
29 A.D.2d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

December 20, 1967


Order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated December 16, 1966, reversed, on the law, without costs, and respondent's motion to settle a stipulation which had been made previously denied, without prejudice to the institution of a plenary suit by respondent, if it be so advised. No questions of fact were considered on this appeal. A motion must be addressed to a pending action ( Matter of Jetter, 78 N.Y. 601, 605). In the instant case, the action was effectively terminated by the foreclosing of the mortgages. Therefore, respondent's sole remedy was to bring a plenary suit rather than to seek an order to settle the stipulation ( Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Royal Ins. Co., 247 N.Y. 435; American Progressive Health Ins. Co. of N Y v. Chartier, 6 A.D.2d 579; see, 2 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ. Prac., par. 2104.06). Christ, Acting P.J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Adams v. George T. Cantrello, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1967
29 A.D.2d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Adams v. George T. Cantrello, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HARRY A. ADAMS, Appellant, v. GEORGE T. CANTRELLO, INC., Respondent, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1967

Citations

29 A.D.2d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Klugherz v. Sutphin Food Shop, Inc.

However, before the order to show cause was served, the warrant of eviction was executed. Since the…

Hallock v. State of N.Y

The Court of Appeals' answer to a certified question in that case clearly indicates that generally motion is…