From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. City of Sarasota, Florida

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 6, 1936
83 F.2d 1005 (5th Cir. 1936)

Opinion

No. 8060.

June 6, 1936.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida; Alexander Akerman, Judge.

Alvan B. Rowe, of Palmetto, Fla., Samuel Kirk, of Bradenton, Fla., and James E. Kirk, of Sarasota, Fla., for appellants.

Harrison E. Barringer, of Sarasota, Fla., for appellee.

Before FOSTER, SIBLEY, and HUTCHESON, Circuit Judges.


The city of Sarasota, a municipality of Florida, filed a petition in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, under the provisions of sections 78, 79, and 80 of the National Bankruptcy Act, added by the Act of May 24, 1934 ( 11 U.S.C.A. §§ 301- 303), for approval and confirmation of a plan of readjustment of its indebtedness. Appellants, owners of certain bonds of the city, were permitted to intervene in opposition thereto and, urging the unconstitutionality of the law on various grounds, prayed for the dismissal of the proceeding. From an adverse ruling this appeal was prosecuted.

On the authority of Ashton v. Cameron County Water Improvement District No. One., 56 S.Ct. 892, 80 L.Ed. ___, decided May 25, 1936, the judgment is reversed and the case remanded, with instructions to dismiss the proceeding.


Summaries of

Adams v. City of Sarasota, Florida

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 6, 1936
83 F.2d 1005 (5th Cir. 1936)
Case details for

Adams v. City of Sarasota, Florida

Case Details

Full title:John ADAMS et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF SARASOTA, FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 6, 1936

Citations

83 F.2d 1005 (5th Cir. 1936)

Citing Cases

In re Richardson

In cases where an objection to the constitutionality of the Act had been made before the Ashton decision was…