From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Adams

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 19, 2006
934 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2006)

Opinion

Case No. SC05-2288.

June 19, 2006.

Lower Tribunal No. 3D05-2335.


As petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the reinstatement of the appeal in Danny Lee Adams v. Debbie Jo Adams a/k/a Debbie Zarate, case number 3D05-2335, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (holding that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists). To the extent petitioner raises claims other than for reinstatement of his appeal, the petition is denied without prejudice.

WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Adams v. Adams

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 19, 2006
934 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2006)
Case details for

Adams v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:DANNY LEE ADAMS, Petitioner(s) v. DEBBIE JO ADAMS A/K/A DEBBIE ZARATE…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 19, 2006

Citations

934 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2006)