From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adamik v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 6, 2010
07 Civ. 10283 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 6, 2010)

Opinion

07 Civ. 10283 (JSR).

April 6, 2010


ORDER


On August 3, 2009, the Honorable Henry Pitman, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation ("Report") in the above-captioned matter recommending that the Court remand this case to the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") with instructions to further develop the record and to conduct further administrative proceedings as the Commissioner deems appropriate.

Neither party has filed any objection to the Report, and, for that reason alone, the parties have waived any right to further appellate review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147-48 (1985);Mario v. P C Food Markets, Inc., 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002); Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility, 219 F.3d 162, 174 (2d Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report, and, for the reasons stated therein, remands this case to the ALJ for further consideration as described in the Report. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case pursuant to sentence four of § 42 U.S.C. 405(g)

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adamik v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 6, 2010
07 Civ. 10283 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Adamik v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT ADAMIK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Apr 6, 2010

Citations

07 Civ. 10283 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 6, 2010)

Citing Cases

Moreau v. Berryhill

Thus, some courts—faced with treating source opinions that opined on the ultimate issue of disability, like…

Adamik v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

See Adamik v. Astrue, No. 07 Civ. 10278 (JSR)(HBP)(S.D.N.Y. 2009). Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman issued an…