From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acme Blacktop Paving v. Brown Matthews

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 31, 1968
30 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

October 31, 1968

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Bastow, P.J., Williams, Del Vecchio, Marsh and Witmer, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: The assignment by plaintiff to United States Fidelity Guaranty Company of all its right, title and interest to moneys due or to become due under the contract with defendants-appellants, including all claims for extra work, is complete and unequivocal. As the assignment now stands, plaintiff has no interest in the proceeds of the contract and therefore may not maintain the present action. ( Cummings v. Morris, 25 N.Y. 625, 627.) If the assignment in its present form does not correctly express the intention of the parties, plaintiff may seek reformation of the instrument. (6 N.Y. Jur., Reformation of Instruments, § 41; Brandwein v. Provident Mut. Life Ins. Co., 3 N.Y.2d 491, 496.)


Summaries of

Acme Blacktop Paving v. Brown Matthews

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 31, 1968
30 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Acme Blacktop Paving v. Brown Matthews

Case Details

Full title:ACME BLACKTOP PAVING CORP., Respondent, v. BROWN MATTHEWS, INC. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1968

Citations

30 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Rockland Lease Funding v. Waste Mgmt. of N.Y

We accordingly conclude that plaintiff lacked standing to bring this action and, therefore, that Supreme…

Modern Settings v. Prudential-Bache Securities

The opinions cited by Modern Settings to the contrary are not persuasive as they involve cases in which the…