From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acholonu v. Hobbs

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 18, 2014
CASE NO. 1D14-0236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D14-0236

02-18-2014

FELIX N. ACHOLONU, M.D., and NORTH FLORIDA OBSTETRICAL & GYNOCOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A., Petitioners, v. HEIKE HOBBS and MAURICE HOBBS, Respondents.

Michael R. D'Lugo of Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondents.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

Petition for Writ of Prohibition -- Original Jurisdiction. Michael R. D'Lugo of Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondents. PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. See Hedrick v. State, 6 So. 3d 688, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that a motion to disqualify is not deemed automatically granted by operation of the rule when the movant has failed to serve the judge as required by rule 2.330(c)). LEWIS, C.J., WOLF and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Acholonu v. Hobbs

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 18, 2014
CASE NO. 1D14-0236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2014)
Case details for

Acholonu v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:FELIX N. ACHOLONU, M.D., and NORTH FLORIDA OBSTETRICAL & GYNOCOLOGICAL…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Feb 18, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 1D14-0236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2014)