From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acheampong v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Sep 26, 2013
531 F. App'x 751 (6th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-1145

2013-09-26

ANDREWS ACHEAMPONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificate Holders of CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates 2006-6; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Appellees.


NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 13a0847n.06


ON APPEAL FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE EASTERN

DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

BEFORE: ROGERS, GRIFFIN, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. After plaintiff Andrews Acheampong defaulted on his mortgage payments, defendant Bank of New York Mellon ("BNYM"), which held an interest in the mortgage, foreclosed on plaintiff's property. Plaintiff brought this action in Michigan state court to invalidate the foreclosure, and defendants removed the case to federal district court. Plaintiff alleged that BNYM lacked standing to foreclose under Michigan law, and that BNYM fraudulently acquired its mortgage interest. Plaintiff also alleged that defendant Bank of America, N.A. ("BANA"), which owned the note secured by the mortgage, denied him a loan modification in violation of Michigan law, and that BANA breached the terms of a trial modification plan it negotiated with plaintiff. Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff's claims, and the district court granted the motion in a written opinion. Plaintiff timely appealed.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, the parties' briefs, and the applicable law, we find no error in the district court's analysis. The reasoning supporting the judgment for defendants was clearly and persuasively articulated by the district court, and accordingly there is no need for a detailed written opinion by this court. Any opinion by us would be duplicative and would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We therefore affirm the district court's judgment for the reasons stated in that court's opinion.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Acheampong v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Sep 26, 2013
531 F. App'x 751 (6th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Acheampong v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon

Case Details

Full title:ANDREWS ACHEAMPONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Bank…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 26, 2013

Citations

531 F. App'x 751 (6th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Szczodrowski v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC

Comp. Laws. § 600.3205(c)], standing alone is not enough to show fraud or irregularity." Acheampong v. Bank…

Super v. Seterus, Inc.

Michigan courts have expressly declined to find that a trial loan modification document is a binding contract…