From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abrams v. Cleveland Terminals Bldg. Co.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
May 31, 1943
136 F.2d 537 (6th Cir. 1943)

Opinion

No. 9425.

May 31, 1943.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; Paul Jones, Judge.

Proceedings in the matter of the corporate reorganization of the Cleveland Terminals Building Company wherein special master recommended partial allowance of various applications for compensation and expenses. The Securities and Exchange Commission intervened. From an order of the district judge confirming report of special master, Meyer Abrams, Harry J. Myerson and Fannie B. Stern, executrix of the estate of Joseph L. Stern, deceased, appealed.

Affirmed.

Meyer Abrams, of Chicago, Ill., and H. Walter Stewart and Thompson, Hine Flory, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellants.

I. Walter Sharp, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

John F. Davis, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Richard B. Ainsworth, of Cleveland, Ohio, for Securities Exchange Commission.

Before HAMILTON, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.


In the proceedings for corporate reorganization involved herein, forty applications for compensation and expense allowance were made in sums totalling $803,944.48 for compensation and $41,929.99 for expense allowance. The Special Master reported his recommendation of allowance to the various applicants of the total sum of $373,178.53 as compensation and $36,014.74 as expense reimbursement.

The District Judge overruled all objections and exceptions to the report of the Special Master, confirmed the report, and ordered the allowance of compensation and expenses as recommended by the Master.

The appellant attorneys, Abrams, Myerson and Stern, have appealed from the order of the District Court. Their claim was for $172,200 as compensation and $6,163.41 as expenses.

The Master recommended, and the District Judge allowed them $18,000 as fees and $2,500 for expenses. The intervening Securities and Exchange Commission had recommended the allowance to the appellant attorneys of $18,000 as compensation and $5,339.51 for expenses.

It is settled law, repeatedly asserted in this circuit, that the concurrent findings of the District Judge and the Master will not be set aside, unless plainly erroneous. In re Allied Products Co. (Continental Casualty Company v. Harold H. Barnett, Trustee in Bankruptcy,) 6 Cir., 134 F.2d 725, decided April 8, 1943; Kowalsky v. American Employers Ins. Co., 6 Cir., 90 F.2d 476, 480.

Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and oral argument, no error of law affecting the determination of this controversy on appeal has been found, and there is abundant evidence to support the concurrent findings of the Master and the District Judge with respect to the fee-compensation and expense allowance to appellants.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Abrams v. Cleveland Terminals Bldg. Co.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
May 31, 1943
136 F.2d 537 (6th Cir. 1943)
Case details for

Abrams v. Cleveland Terminals Bldg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ABRAMS et al. v. CLEVELAND TERMINALS BLDG. CO

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: May 31, 1943

Citations

136 F.2d 537 (6th Cir. 1943)

Citing Cases

Gochenour v. Cleveland Terminals Bldg. Co.

Appellants, as attorneys for a group of bondholder creditors have heretofore been awarded $18,000 for legal…