From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abdullah v. Idaho

Supreme Court of the United States
Feb 29, 2016
577 U.S. 1146 (2016)

Summary

noting that the correct standards to evaluate ineffective assistance of counsel claims are "the prevailing professional norms at the time of trial"

Summary of this case from Wurdemann v. State

Opinion

No. 15–6669.

02-29-2016

AZAD HAJI ABDULLAH, petitioner, v. IDAHO.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Idaho denied.


Summaries of

Abdullah v. Idaho

Supreme Court of the United States
Feb 29, 2016
577 U.S. 1146 (2016)

noting that the correct standards to evaluate ineffective assistance of counsel claims are "the prevailing professional norms at the time of trial"

Summary of this case from Wurdemann v. State
Case details for

Abdullah v. Idaho

Case Details

Full title:AZAD HAJI ABDULLAH, petitioner, v. IDAHO.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Feb 29, 2016

Citations

577 U.S. 1146 (2016)
136 S. Ct. 1161
194 L. Ed. 2d 188

Citing Cases

Wurdemann v. State

State v. Abdullah , 158 Idaho 386, 481, 348 P.3d 1, 96 (2015), cert. denied sub nom. Abdullah v. Idaho , –––…