From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abdelrazig v. Essence Communications, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 28, 1996
225 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 28, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (James Shaw, J.).


We agree with the IAS Court that it cannot be said, as a matter of law, that there is no "real relationship" between the article, which concerns newsworthy fashion trends in the Black community ( see, Stephano v News Group Publs., 64 N.Y.2d 174), and the photograph in which plaintiff appears in the background wearing traditional African garb ( cf., Finger v Omni Publs. Intl., 77 N.Y.2d 138). We also agree with the IAS court that plaintiff's claim that the article is an "advertisement in disguise" is too speculative to raise a bona fide issue of fact ( see, Stephano v News Group Publs., supra, at 186; Cruz v Latin News Impacto Newspaper, 216 A.D.2d 50).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Abdelrazig v. Essence Communications, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 28, 1996
225 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Abdelrazig v. Essence Communications, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MALIK ABDELRAZIG, Appellant, v. ESSENCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 28, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 811

Citing Cases

Zoll v. Jordache Enterprises Inc.

While this language may, at first blush, seem expansive, the "`advertisement in disguise' exception is very…

Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr Printing & Publishing

Applying these principles, courts have held that a wide variety of articles on matters of public interest —…