From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abbott v. Otis Elevator Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1990
166 A.D.2d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

October 9, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cohen, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

When causes of action exist against several persons, the commencement of an action against one or more individuals does not constitute an election of remedies which bars an action against other potential defendants (see, CPLR 3002 [a]). The record in this case reveals that the plaintiff initiated an action against three defendants whom she believed to be responsible for her injuries. Following investigation, she instituted a second action against the appellant Rockefeller Center, Inc.

As the action against Rockefeller Center, Inc., was timely commenced and constituted a separate action, we find that this second action did not involve adding a party to a pending litigation which would require leave of the court. We note that the two actions have been consolidated. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Abbott v. Otis Elevator Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1990
166 A.D.2d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Abbott v. Otis Elevator Company

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE ABBOTT, Respondent, v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 9, 1990

Citations

166 A.D.2d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
560 N.Y.S.2d 689

Citing Cases

Seaman v. Fichet-Bauche North America, Inc.

Nor was the plaintiff under any duty to amend its pleadings in the prior District Court action in order to…