From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ABAD v. ISCO, INC

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Oct 31, 1995
537 N.W.2d 620 (Minn. 1995)

Summary

reversing Abad v. ISCO, Inc., 534 N.W.2d 728, (Minn.App. 1995) ( Abad I)

Summary of this case from Podvin v. Jamar Co.

Opinion

No. C5-95-340.

September 28, 1995. Rehearing Denied October 31, 1995.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of defendant ISCO, Inc. for further review of the July 25, 1995 decision of the court of appeals be, and the same is, granted for the purpose of reversing that decision and reinstating the summary judgment entered in defendant's favor in the Hennepin County District Court. The trial court properly concluded that, under the recorded circumstances, there was no genuine issue of material fact as to whether "good cause" existed for the plaintiffs' failure to commence this action during the 2-year period from the filing of a notice of intent to dissolve, Minn.Stat. § 302A.7291, to formal dissolution. See Minn.Stat. § 302A.781.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alexander M. Keith A.M. Keith Chief Justice


Summaries of

ABAD v. ISCO, INC

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Oct 31, 1995
537 N.W.2d 620 (Minn. 1995)

reversing Abad v. ISCO, Inc., 534 N.W.2d 728, (Minn.App. 1995) ( Abad I)

Summary of this case from Podvin v. Jamar Co.
Case details for

ABAD v. ISCO, INC

Case Details

Full title:Joseph A. ABAD, et al., Appellants, v. ISCO, INC., Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Oct 31, 1995

Citations

537 N.W.2d 620 (Minn. 1995)

Citing Cases

Podvin v. Jamar Co.

The Minnesota Supreme Court, however, has strictly construed the time limit for asserting claims against…

Jones v. Billings County School Dist. #1

1(3) was derived, the Minnesota Court of Appeals concluded "claimants and creditors have an absolute right to…