From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.A. Sutain, Ltd. v. Montgomery Ward Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 28, 1966
17 N.Y.2d 776 (N.Y. 1966)

Summary

holding that a dissolved corporation may bring a suit for breach of contract after it has been reinstated

Summary of this case from Umeze v. Fidelis Care N.Y.

Opinion

Argued March 29, 1966

Decided April 28, 1966

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, OWEN McGIVERN, J.

John M. Johnston and John D. Lockton, Jr., for appellant.

Alfred H. Adler and Joseph Goldberg for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.


Summaries of

A.A. Sutain, Ltd. v. Montgomery Ward Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 28, 1966
17 N.Y.2d 776 (N.Y. 1966)

holding that a dissolved corporation may bring a suit for breach of contract after it has been reinstated

Summary of this case from Umeze v. Fidelis Care N.Y.
Case details for

A.A. Sutain, Ltd. v. Montgomery Ward Company

Case Details

Full title:A.A. SUTAIN, LTD., Respondent, v. MONTGOMERY WARD COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 28, 1966

Citations

17 N.Y.2d 776 (N.Y. 1966)
270 N.Y.S.2d 626
217 N.E.2d 674

Citing Cases

Lorisa Capital Corp. v. Gallo

Ins. Underwriting Assn., 94 A.D.2d 79, 80, mod on other grounds 63 N.Y.2d 201 [if delinquent corporation not…

GMAC Mortg. v. Coombs

"Failure to plead a defense that must be pleaded affirmatively under CPLR 3018(b) is a waiver of that…