From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A., T. S.F. Ry. Co. v. Dixie Carriers

U.S.
Dec 9, 1957
355 U.S. 179 (1957)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

No. 60.

Decided December 9, 1957.

Together with No. 61, United States v. Dixie Carriers, Inc., et al., and No. 62, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Dixie Carriers, Inc., et al., also on appeal from the same Court.

Upon suggestion of mootness, judgment vacated and case remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint.

Reported below: 143 F. Supp. 844.

Robert H. Bierma, Richard J. Murphy and Harvey Huston for the Atchison, Topeka Santa Fe Railway Co. et al., appellants in No. 60.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States, appellant in No. 61, and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellant in No. 62.

Donald Macleay, Harry C. Ames, Harry C. Ames, Jr., Nuel D. Belnap, T. S. Christopher and John C. Ridley for appellees.



Upon the suggestion of mootness the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas is vacated and the case is remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint.


Summaries of

A., T. S.F. Ry. Co. v. Dixie Carriers

U.S.
Dec 9, 1957
355 U.S. 179 (1957)
Case details for

A., T. S.F. Ry. Co. v. Dixie Carriers

Case Details

Full title:ATCHISON, TOPEKA SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v . DIXIE CARRIERS, INC., ET…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 9, 1957

Citations

355 U.S. 179 (1957)

Citing Cases

Mechling Barge Lines v. U.S.

See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39-40, n. 2; Cozart v. Wilson, 352 U.S. 884. In…

Younger Brothers, Inc. v. United States

When pursued it means, of course, that the Commission's action stands or falls with the Examiner's Report.…