From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A. C. L. R. R. Co. v. Florida Fine Fruit Co.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jan 21, 1927
93 Fla. 171 (Fla. 1927)

Opinion

Decision Filed January 21, 1927. Petition for Rehearing Denied February 25, 1927.

A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Duval County; Daniel A. Simmons, Judge.

Doggett, Christie Doggett, for Petitioner;

P. L. Gaskins, John F. Hall and Gary W. Alexander, for Respondent.


Careful examination of the record in this cause disclosed that the parties, the issues and the questions of law raised herein are identical to the parties, the issues and the question of law raised in Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, a Corporation, v. Florida Fine Fruit Company, a Corporation, Number 538-Ap., decided this term, so the judgment of the Civil Court of Record as affirmed by the Circuit Court of Duval County is quashed on authority of that case.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND BUFORD, J., concur.

ELLIS, C. J., AND STRUM AND BROWN, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Opinion Filed June 14, 1927.


Petition for rehearing on the part of respondent was granted in this cause for the purpose of further considering whether or not the petition for certiorari should be denied on the ground that a good case was made on the general negligence and delay counts.

The record has been carefully re-examined. The verdict was general and the errors on which the judgment below was quashed so permeated and effected the entire proceeding we think that our former judgment herein must be and is hereby approved and the judgment of the Civil Court of Record as affirmed by the Circuit Court of Duval County is hereby quashed.

All concur.


Summaries of

A. C. L. R. R. Co. v. Florida Fine Fruit Co.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jan 21, 1927
93 Fla. 171 (Fla. 1927)
Case details for

A. C. L. R. R. Co. v. Florida Fine Fruit Co.

Case Details

Full title:ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, Petitioner, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Jan 21, 1927

Citations

93 Fla. 171 (Fla. 1927)
112 So. 70

Citing Cases

Sutherland v. State

A defendant has a right to a statement of particulars only when the charging document does not give him…

Crawford v. State

While the information in this case is not very clearly drawn, denial of the motion to quash the same does not…