From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

580 Park Ave., Inc. v. Mirto

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Jun 26, 2019
64 Misc. 3d 133 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

570090/18

06-26-2019

580 PARK AVENUE, INCORPORATED, Petitioner-Landlord v. Joseph R. MIRTO, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.


Per Curiam.

Order (Jose A. Padilla, Jr., J.), dated January 11, 2018, affirmed, with $10 costs.

The parties' stipulation of settlement is clear, and literal enforcement of its terms is not unjust under the circumstances (see Taboola, Inc. v. Newsweek Media Group, Inc. , 171 AD3d 510 [2019] ; Mill Rock Plaza Assoc. v. Lively , 224 AD2d 301 [1996] ). The commercial tenant clearly violated the stipulation's provisions by failing to make two scheduled payments in a timely manner and then by failing to cure the first payment default in the agreed-upon five-day period (see Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Rubenstein , 26 AD3d 219, 220 [2006] ). Moreover, literal enforcement of the terms of the stipulation of settlement is not unjust in this case, where the agreement was negotiated by sophisticated parties, all of whom were represented by counsel, and the default was neither inadvertent nor trivial (see McKenzie v. Vintage Hallmark, 302 AD2d 503 [2003] ; see also 1029 Sixth v. Riniv Corp. , 9 AD3d 142 [2004], appeal dismissed 4 NY3d 795 [2005] ).

We have considered tenant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

580 Park Ave., Inc. v. Mirto

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Jun 26, 2019
64 Misc. 3d 133 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

580 Park Ave., Inc. v. Mirto

Case Details

Full title:580 Park Avenue, Incorporated, Petitioner-Landlord- v. Joseph R. Mirto…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Jun 26, 2019

Citations

64 Misc. 3d 133 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 51067
116 N.Y.S.3d 843