From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

50 v. Gonzales, Rohr Industries, Inc. v. Gonzales

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 12, 1984
730 F.2d 769 (9th Cir. 1984)

Summary

noting that "the effect of the duty to mitigate is simply to limit the time period during which the trader may reenter the market at the broker's expense. Failure to reenter within a reasonable time period is deemed to be a decision to stay out."

Summary of this case from Stoddard v. Manufacturers Nat. Bk., Grand Rapids

Opinion


730 F.2d 769 (9th Cir. 1984) Rohr Industries, Inc. v. Gonzales (Richard); International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge No. 50 v. Gonzales (Richard) Nos. 83-6262, 83-6263 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit March 12, 1984

Editorial Note:

This opinion is published in the Federal reporter in a table titled §Table of decisions without reported opinions§. These decisions do not meet the specific criteria for publication and these decisions cannot be cited unless being used for res judicata or collateral estoppel. (Ninth Circuit Rules, Rule 36-3,28 U.S.C.A.)

Appeal fro: S.D.Cal.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

50 v. Gonzales, Rohr Industries, Inc. v. Gonzales

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 12, 1984
730 F.2d 769 (9th Cir. 1984)

noting that "the effect of the duty to mitigate is simply to limit the time period during which the trader may reenter the market at the broker's expense. Failure to reenter within a reasonable time period is deemed to be a decision to stay out."

Summary of this case from Stoddard v. Manufacturers Nat. Bk., Grand Rapids
Case details for

50 v. Gonzales, Rohr Industries, Inc. v. Gonzales

Case Details

Full title:Rohr Industries, Inc. v. Gonzales (Richard); International Association of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 12, 1984

Citations

730 F.2d 769 (9th Cir. 1984)

Citing Cases

Stoddard v. Manufacturers Nat. Bk., Grand Rapids

The principle of mitigation is subsumed in the allowance of a reasonable period to repurchase the stock. See…

Modern Settings v. Prudential-Bache

The rationale for this formulation is to approximate the price at which the injured investor might have sold…