From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

48-48 Associates v. Piccoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 1997
243 A.D.2d 291 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 9, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.).


The IAS Court correctly determined, without a hearing, that the insolvent corporation's transfer to its director and sole shareholder was lacking in good faith ( see, Julien J. Studley, Inc. v. Lefrak, 66 A.D.2d 208, 213-214, affd 48 N.Y.2d 954), and that since the latter was the only other creditor of the former, it would be inequitable, in voiding the transfer, to effect a pro rata distribution. That petitioner is not a secured or judgment creditor is irrelevant under a statute that extends protection against fraudulent transfers to debts not in existence at the time of the transfer ( supra, at 214); moreover, respondents had induced petitioner's forbearance from reducing its debt to judgment or restraining the disputed funds. We have considered respondents' other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

48-48 Associates v. Piccoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 1997
243 A.D.2d 291 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

48-48 Associates v. Piccoli

Case Details

Full title:48-48 ASSOCIATES, Respondent, v. ANTHONY L. PICCOLI et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 9, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 291 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 33

Citing Cases

Mastrantonio v. King

There is one important limitation on the general proposition that payment of antecedent debts is fair…

Insilco Corporation v. Star Services, Inc.

The challenged transfer of the subject townhouse, from defendant Star Services to defendant PRD Holdings, was…