§
Matter of Lamus-Pava

8 Cited authorities

  1. Dada v. Mukasey

    554 U.S. 1 (2008)   Cited 260 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that aliens must be permitted to unilaterally withdraw voluntary departure requests in order to pursue motions to reopen

  2. Yu Zhao v. Gonzales

    404 F.3d 295 (5th Cir. 2005)   Cited 485 times
    Holding the denial of a motion for reconsideration is reviewed under a "highly deferential abuse-of-discretion standard"

  3. Sarr v. Gonzales

    485 F.3d 354 (6th Cir. 2007)   Cited 47 times
    Recognizing that a petitioner who fails to demonstrate entitlement to asylum cannot as a matter of law meet the more onerous burden for withholding of removal or the more stringent requirements of the CAT

  4. Bhiski v. Ashcroft

    373 F.3d 363 (3d Cir. 2004)   Cited 43 times
    Upholding the sufficiency of an administrative notice of appeal that made "the BIA aware of precisely what issues were being appealed"

  5. Ramchandani v. Gonzales

    434 F.3d 337 (5th Cir. 2005)   Cited 32 times
    Suggesting that evidence of when a labor certification application was submitted can consist of "some showing" that the application was filed

  6. Melnitsenko v. Mukasey

    517 F.3d 42 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that "the BIA may not deny motion based solely on the fact of the DHS's objection if the BIA denies a motion to reopen based on the merits of the DHS's objection, the BIA must provide adequate reasoning as to why the objection calls for denial of the motion to reopen"

  7. Ahmed v. Mukasey

    548 F.3d 768 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that when the Department opposes a motion to reopen for adjustment of status the BIA can consider the objection but not deny the motion solely on the Department’s objection

  8. Section 1003.10 - Immigration judges

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.10   Cited 82 times
    Authorizing Director to "designate . . . temporary immigration judges for renewable terms not to exceed six months"