§
In the Matter of S

6 Cited authorities

  1. Glasser v. U.S.

    315 U.S. 60 (1942)   Cited 7,024 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a jury verdict must be sustained "if there is substantial evidence, taking the view most favorable to the Government, to support it"

  2. Hammerschmidt v. U.S.

    265 U.S. 182 (1924)   Cited 332 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Hammerschmidt, the Court stated that "a mere open defiance of the governmental purpose to enforce a law by urging persons subject to it to disobey it" does not fall within the scope of the statute.

  3. United States v. Holte

    236 U.S. 140 (1915)   Cited 82 times
    Finding that a transported woman could conspire to violate the Mann Act

  4. Mackin v. United States

    117 U.S. 348 (1886)   Cited 121 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Discussing 1834 Act

  5. U.S. v. Carrollo

    30 F. Supp. 3 (W.D. Mo. 1939)   Cited 21 times
    Involving income tax violation § 145(b)

  6. United States v. Reimer

    30 F. Supp. 767 (S.D.N.Y. 1939)   Cited 5 times

    December 28, 1939. Jacob W. Rozinsky, of New York City, for relator. John T. Cahill, of New York City (K. Bertram Friedman, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent. CONGER, District Judge. The relator herein, Alberto Berlandi; has been ordered deported to Italy, pursuant to the Immigration Act of 1917, Title 8, Section 155, U.S.C. § 8 U.S.C.A. § 155, which provides generally that an alien, who at any time after his entry into this country is sentenced more than once to imprisonment for a term