§
In the Matter of S

48 Cited authorities

  1. Kercheval v. United States

    274 U.S. 220 (1927)   Cited 989 times
    Holding petitioner's initial guilty plea to mail fraud, later vacated by district court at request of petitioner, could not then be put before a jury at trial as evidence of petitioner's guilt

  2. Wong Tai v. United States

    273 U.S. 77 (1927)   Cited 679 times
    Holding that "it is not necessary ... to state object [of the conspiracy] with the detail which would be required in an indictment for committing the substantive offense"

  3. Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police

    245 U.S. 128 (1917)   Cited 249 times
    Holding that "[t]he statute of limitations is a defense and must be asserted on the trial by the defendant in criminal cases"

  4. Edwards v. United States

    256 F.2d 707 (D.C. Cir. 1958)   Cited 143 times
    In Edwards v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 152, 256 F.2d 707, cert. denied, 358 U.S. 847, 79 S.Ct. 74, 3 L.Ed.2d 82 (1958), petitioner complained of the ineffective assistance of counsel who told him that "there is nothing I can do for you" when, in fact, there were things which he allegedly might have done — including moving to suppress an illegally secured confession.

  5. United States v. Parrino

    212 F.2d 919 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 130 times
    In Parrino, a 1954 decision cited by the Majority, we observed that criminal convictions can carry consequences like deportation that have "terrific impact" but that do not "directly flow[]" from a judgment, and we suggested that defendants have no constitutional right to be apprised by counsel of such collateral consequences before entering a guilty plea, no matter how "surprised" they may be by those consequences.

  6. Thornton v. United States

    271 U.S. 414 (1926)   Cited 78 times
    In Thornton v. United States, 271 U.S. 414, 46 S.Ct. 585, 70 L.Ed. 1013, the Court held that Congress may require the inspection of all cattle in a disease infected area without regard to whether they were to be shipped in interstate commerce.

  7. Pierce v. Creecy

    210 U.S. 387 (1908)   Cited 118 times
    In Pierce v. Creecy, the Court acknowledged that "an objection which, if well founded, would destroy the sufficiency of the indictment, as a criminal pleading, might conceivably go far enough to destroy also its sufficiency as a charge of crime."

  8. Hadjipateras v. Pacifica, S.A

    290 F.2d 697 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 54 times
    Finding that §1292 gave the appellate machinery "a considerable amount of flexibility" so that "disadvantages of piecemeal and final judgment appeals might both be avoided"

  9. Friedman v. United States

    200 F.2d 690 (8th Cir. 1953)   Cited 63 times
    In Friedman v. United States, 200 F.2d 690, 696 (8th Cir. 1952), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 926, 73 S.Ct. 784, 97 L.Ed. 1357 (1953), the court held that the question of guilt or innocence was not involved in ruling on a motion to withdraw a guilty plea.

  10. United States v. Parker

    292 F.2d 2 (6th Cir. 1961)   Cited 42 times
    Stating that Section 2255 "does not give a prisoner the right to obtain a review—first by the court which imposed the sentence and then on appeal from denial of his motion to vacate sentence—of errors of fact or law that must be raised by timely appeal."

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,718 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"