In the Matter of Rahman

14 Cited authorities

  1. Jean v. Nelson

    472 U.S. 846 (1985)   Cited 384 times
    Holding that the governing statute provided adequate relief to petitioners and made it unnecessary to address the constitutional issue
  2. Jean v. Nelson

    727 F.2d 957 (11th Cir. 1984)   Cited 219 times
    Holding that an excludable alien had no claim under the equal protection clause alleging that Haitians were disproportionately affected by a particular policy
  3. El Rescate Legal Services, Inc. v. Executive Office of Immigration Review

    959 F.2d 742 (9th Cir. 1991)   Cited 152 times
    Holding that "the BIA's policy, not to require interpretation of the entire immigration court proceedings once it has determined that an interpreter is needed," conforms to the Immigration and Nationality Act, its interpretative regulations, and the Constitution
  4. Maldonado-Perez v. I.N.S.

    865 F.2d 328 (D.C. Cir. 1989)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that alien must name specific witnesses in order to prevail on change of venue motion
  5. Louis v. Nelson

    544 F. Supp. 973 (S.D. Fla. 1982)   Cited 28 times
    Noting that 125,000 Cubans came into the United States during the spring of 1980
  6. Ledesma-Valdes v. Sava

    604 F. Supp. 675 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)   Cited 18 times
    In Ledesma-Valdes v. Sava, 604 F. Supp. 675 (S.D.N.Y. 1985), the parole denial was held not to be an abuse of discretion based upon prior escapes by similarly situated persons.
  7. Chlomos v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, I. N. S

    516 F.2d 310 (3d Cir. 1975)   Cited 25 times
    In Chlomos, however, the immigration hearing officer proceeded with the case "despite Chlomos's repeated requests for his lawyer."
  8. Committee of Cent. American Refugees v. I.N.S.

    682 F. Supp. 1055 (N.D. Cal. 1988)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that a transfer to another INS facility, "standing alone, does not constitute a violation of plaintiffs' due process or statutory rights justifying the issuance of injunctive relief to restrict the Attorney General's discretion" to detain aliens in appropriate INS facilities
  9. Sasso v. Milhollan

    735 F. Supp. 1045 (S.D. Fla. 1990)   Cited 4 times

    No. 90-0761-CIV. April 19, 1990. Elena C. Tauler, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff. Dexter A. Lee, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION SCOTT, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This Cause is before the Court on Plaintiff Peter Anthony Sasso's Application for Preliminary Injunction. The Plaintiff, a deportable alien presently detained at the Dade County Jail, requests that the Immigration and Naturalization Service be enjoined from conducting his deportation hearing in El Paso

  10. La Franca v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    413 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 15 times
    Finding that the agency properly refused to reopen the petitioner's deportation hearing, based, in part, on the fact that, even assuming the unlawfulness of his arrest, it relied upon the concession of deportability by his counsel at the hearing and not “any statements taken or evidence seized at the time of his arrest”
  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,759 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
  12. Section 1103 - Powers and duties of the Secretary, the Under Secretary, and the Attorney General

    8 U.S.C. § 1103   Cited 820 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General power to "establish such regulations" and "review . . . administrative determinations in immigration proceedings"
  13. Section 1362 - Right to counsel

    8 U.S.C. § 1362   Cited 250 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing right to privately retained counsel
  14. Section 103.1 - Reserved

    8 C.F.R. § 103.1   Cited 60 times
    Defining immigration officer to include Border Patrol agents