§
In the Matter of P

22 Cited authorities

  1. Jordan v. De George

    341 U.S. 223 (1951)   Cited 711 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defrauding the United States of tax on distilled spirits is a serious crime involving moral turpitude

  2. Carlson v. Landon

    342 U.S. 524 (1952)   Cited 627 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mandatory detention of Communist noncitizens in removal proceedings does not violate the Due Process Clause

  3. Harisiades v. Shaughnessy

    342 U.S. 580 (1952)   Cited 561 times
    Holding that the Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to deportation orders because "[d]eportation, however severe its consequences, has been consistently classified as a civil rather than a criminal procedure"

  4. Bridges v. Wixon

    326 U.S. 135 (1945)   Cited 461 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding only that a court may not admit hearsay for substantive, as opposed to impeachment, purposes

  5. United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod

    263 U.S. 149 (1923)   Cited 345 times
    Holding that there is no "presumption of citizenship comparable to the presumption of innocence in a criminal case. . . . To defeat deportation it is not always enough for the person arrested to stand mute at the hearing and put the Government upon its proof."

  6. Mahler v. Eby

    264 U.S. 32 (1924)   Cited 230 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government failed to comply "with all the statutory requirements"

  7. Johannessen v. United States

    225 U.S. 227 (1912)   Cited 164 times
    Holding that the retroactive effect of a denaturalization order does not violate the prohibition against ex post facto laws

  8. Bugajewitz v. Adams

    228 U.S. 585 (1913)   Cited 91 times
    Holding that the determination that an alien is an undesirable person "is not a conviction of crime, nor is the deportation a punishment; it is simply a refusal by the Government to harbor persons whom it does not want"

  9. Attorney General v. Pelletier

    240 Mass. 264 (Mass. 1922)   Cited 156 times
    In AttorneyGeneral v. Pelletier (1922), 240 Mass. 264, 134 N.E. 407, the testimony of grand jurors was held to have been properly received in an action brought by the Attorney General to remove a local prosecutor from office on charges that he had not properly performed his duties — specifically that he had sought leniency for a friend.

  10. Boston v. Santosuosso

    307 Mass. 302 (Mass. 1940)   Cited 81 times

    February 6, 7, 1939. November 22, 1940. Present: FIELD, C.J., DONAHUE, LUMMUS, QUA, DOLAN, JJ. Equity Jurisdiction, To enforce trust. Trust, What constitutes, Constructive. Conspiracy. Agency, What constitutes, Of fellow conspirator. Equity Pleading and Practice, Appeal, Jury issues, Waiver, Rehearing. Judgment. Constitutional Law. Trial by jury. Municipal Corporations, Officers and agents. Fiduciary. Evidence, Affecting credibility of witness, Competency, Of conviction, Consciousness of guilt, Admission