§

IN THE MATTER OF M/V SIGNEBORG

9 I&N Dec. 6 (B.I.A. 1960)
IN THE MATTER OF M/V SIGNEBORG

10 Cited authorities

  1. Miller v. Robertson

    266 U.S. 243 (1924)   Cited 245 times
    Holding that a remedial provision should be liberally construed to give a remedy in all cases intended to be covered

  2. Costanzo v. Tillinghast

    287 U.S. 341 (1932)   Cited 72 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 110. Argued November 17, 18, 1932. Decided December 5, 1932. 1. Where, in a proceeding in habeas corpus challenging the legality of an order of deportation under the Immigration Act of 1917, it appears that the action of the Secretary of Labor in issuing the order was supported by evidence, his findings are not subject to review by the courts. P. 342. 2. Section 19 of the Immigration Act of 1917 imposes no period of limitation

  3. Shultz v. Morgan

    Civil Action No. DKC-11-3652 (D. Md. Oct. 3, 2014)   Cited 2 times

    Civil Action No. DKC-11-3652 10-03-2014 RANDY T. SHULTZ, # 324-839 Petitioner v. PHILIP MORGAN, Warden, et al. Respondents DEBORAH K. CHASANOW United States District Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending is Randy T. Shultz's ("Shultz") petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondents, by their counsel, have filed a response with exhibits (Resp. ECF No. 13), to which Shultz, who is self-represented, has replied. (Reply, ECF No. 16). After considering the pleadings, exhibits

  4. Missouri, K. T. Ry. Co. v. United States

    231 U.S. 112 (1913)   Cited 65 times
    In Missouri K. T.R. Co. v. U.S. 231 U.S. 112, 34 S.Ct. 26, 27, 58 L. Ed. 144, the court held that inactive time was to be included in applying a Federal statute prohibiting the keeping of employees of carriers on duty more than sixteen consecutive hours.

  5. Grant Bros. v. United States

    232 U.S. 647 (1914)   Cited 28 times
    Upholding the award of a civil fine against a defendant who "solicited the migration and importation into the United States . . . of a designated alien laborer"

  6. Lloyd Royal Belge Societe Anonyme v. Elting

    61 F.2d 745 (2d Cir. 1932)   Cited 19 times

    No. 19. November 7, 1932. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by Lloyd Royal Belge Societe Anonyme against Phillip Elting, Collector of Customs of the Port of New York, to recover a penalty paid under protest in order to obtain clearance for plaintiff's steamship. Judgment for defendant [ 55 F.2d 340], and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating McGrann, of New York City (Delbert M. Tibbetts and Joseph F. Luley,

  7. United States v. J.H. Winchester Co.

    40 F.2d 472 (2d Cir. 1930)   Cited 20 times
    In United States v. J.H. Winchester Co., 40 F.2d 472, there was an effort to subject the agent of a foreign ship to a fine for a failure to detain after inspection.

  8. Auers v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

    25 F. Supp. 458 (N.D. Tex. 1938)

    25 F.Supp. 458 (N.D.Tex. 1938) AUERS v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO. et al. No. 887. United States District Court, N.D. Texas Dec. 3, 1938. Bonner, King, Dawson & Jones, of Wichita Falls, Tex., for plaintiff. T. L. Dyer, of Austin, Tex., and Tom D. Lumpkin and E. H. Foster, both of Amarillo, Tex., for defendant. ATWELL, District Judge. After the issue is made, the defendant moves to dismiss on the ground that the plaintiff is seeking to recover for the transfer of a 'shooting permit' which is a 'security'

  9. United States v. National Surety Co.

    20 F.2d 972 (S.D. Ala. 1927)   Cited 6 times

    July 28, 1927. Alex C. Birch, U.S. Atty., of Mobile, Ala. Pillans, Cowley Gresham, of Mobile, Ala., for defendant. At Law. Action by the United States against the National Surety Company. On demurrer to complaint. Demurrer overruled. ERVIN, District Judge. This is a suit on a bond made by the defendant surety company, to recover $11,000 on the following facts: The Greek steamship Chelatros arrived in Mobile, having on board 30 aliens signed up as seamen, and the immigration officer located in Mobile

  10. Section 1284 - Control of alien crewmen

    8 U.S.C. § 1284   Cited 15 times

    (a) Penalties for failure The owner, agent, consignee, charterer, master, or commanding officer of any vessel or aircraft arriving in the United States from any place outside thereof who fails (1) to detain on board the vessel, or in the case of an aircraft to detain at a place specified by an immigration officer at the expense of the airline, any alien crewman employed thereon until an immigration officer has completely inspected such alien crewman, including a physical examination by the medical