§

In the Matter of Levine

13 I&N Dec. 244 (B.I.A. 1969)
In the Matter of Levine

4 Cited authorities

  1. Rediker v. Rediker

    35 Cal.2d 796 (Cal. 1950)   Cited 72 times
    In Rediker v. Rediker, 35 Cal.2d 796 [ 221 P.2d 1, 20 A.L.R.2d 1152], we did not find it necessary to decide whether a foreign divorce decree could be attacked on these grounds, since it was to be assumed in the absence of evidence to the contrary that the plaintiff was a bona fide resident of Cuba and that therefore the foreign court had jurisdiction even if measured by our standards.

  2. Dietrich v. Dietrich

    41 Cal.2d 497 (Cal. 1953)   Cited 44 times
    In Dietrich v. Dietrich, 41 Cal.2d 497, 261 P.2d 269, Carol Dietrich sued her husband, Noah Dietrich, for separate maintenance.

  3. Scott v. Scott

    51 Cal.2d 249 (Cal. 1958)   Cited 16 times

    Docket No. L.A. 24855. November 18, 1958. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Newcomb Condee, Judge. Affirmed. Monta W. Shirley and George W. Nilsson for Appellant. Hahn, Ross Saunders and E. Loyd Saunders for Respondent. McCOMB, J. Defendant Winifred C. Scott appeals from a judgment in a declaratory relief action decreeing that a divorce procured by plaintiff from her in the District of Bravos, State of Chihuahua, Republic of Mexico, on March 17, 1956, was valid.

  4. Watson v. Watson

    39 Cal.2d 305 (Cal. 1952)   Cited 22 times
    In Watson v. Watson (1952) 39 Cal.2d 305 [ 246 P.2d 19], for example, the plaintiff obtained a divorce decree from his first wife in Nevada and married the defendant, but the defendant filed for divorce a year and a half later.