§

In the Matter of Exilus

18 I&N Dec. 276 (B.I.A. 1982)
In the Matter of Exilus

39 Cited authorities

  1. Richardson v. Perales

    402 U.S. 389 (1971)   Cited 55,646 times
    Holding that, when "presented with the not uncommon situation of conflicting medical evidence . . . [t]he trier of fact has the duty to resolve that conflict"

  2. Mathews v. Eldridge

    424 U.S. 319 (1976)   Cited 15,757 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a procedure based on written submissions was adequate because it included safeguards against mistake including that the agency informed the recipient of its tentative assessment and the evidence supporting it and an opportunity was then afforded the recipient to submit additional evidence "enabling him to challenge directly the accuracy of information in his file as well as the correctness of the agency's tentative conclusions"

  3. Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy

    367 U.S. 886 (1961)   Cited 1,782 times
    Holding that where plaintiff "remained entirely free to obtain employment" either with her employer or another employer, her liberty right in "follow[ing] a chosen trade or profession" was not implicated

  4. United States ex Rel. Negron v. State of N.Y

    434 F.2d 386 (2d Cir. 1970)   Cited 177 times
    Holding that a defendant who spoke no English, and “s[a]t in total incomprehension as the trial proceeded,” was not sufficiently “present” to satisfy the dictates of the Sixth Amendment

  5. Tejeda-Mata v. Immig. Naturalization Serv

    626 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 109 times
    Holding that "if a petitioner wishes to preserve an issue for appeal, he must first raise it in the proper administrative forum"

  6. McMullen v. Imm. Naturalization Serv

    658 F.2d 1312 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 86 times
    Noting that refugees fleeing political persecution are often limited in the evidence they can submit to support their claims

  7. United States v. Carrion

    488 F.2d 12 (1st Cir. 1973)   Cited 66 times
    Holding that "whenever put on notice that there may be some significant language difficulty, the court should make such a determination of need [for an interpreter]"

  8. Nicholas v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    590 F.2d 802 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that INS violated its own regulation in processing a non-citizen's request for immigration records

  9. Paul v. United States Immigration Nat. Serv

    521 F.2d 194 (5th Cir. 1975)   Cited 50 times
    Considering failure to file with BIA as factor in denying remand

  10. Ramirez v. I. N. S

    550 F.2d 560 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that rules prescribing who may represent another in deportation proceedings are not unconstitutional and are consistent with the governing statutes

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,716 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  12. Section 1253 - Penalties related to removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1253   Cited 1,122 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Establishing an exception to withholding for a dangerous alien who has been convicted of a "particularly serious crime," defined to include an "aggravated felony"

  13. Section 208.10 - Failure to appear at an interview before an asylum officer or failure to follow requirements for fingerprint processing

    8 C.F.R. § 208.10   Cited 45 times
    Requiring the applicant to demonstrate "exceptional circumstances" to excuse her failure to appear