§
In the Matter of A.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Bridges v. Wixon

    326 U.S. 135 (1945)   Cited 461 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding only that a court may not admit hearsay for substantive, as opposed to impeachment, purposes

  2. Vajtauer v. Comm'r of Immigration

    273 U.S. 103 (1927)   Cited 433 times
    Holding that deportation "on charges unsupported by any evidence is a denial of due process which may be corrected on habeas corpus"

  3. United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod

    263 U.S. 149 (1923)   Cited 345 times
    Holding that there is no "presumption of citizenship comparable to the presumption of innocence in a criminal case. . . . To defeat deportation it is not always enough for the person arrested to stand mute at the hearing and put the Government upon its proof."

  4. The Japanese Immigrant Case

    189 U.S. 86 (1903)   Cited 271 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a noncitizen may not "be taken into custody and deported without giving him all opportunity to be heard" because "[n]o such arbitrary power can exist where the principles involved in due process of law are recognized"

  5. United States v. Watkins

    71 F. Supp. 429 (S.D.N.Y. 1947)   Cited 10 times
    In United States ex rel. Von Kleczkowski v. Watkins, D.C., 71 F. Supp. 429, April 22, 1947, Judge Rifkind was faced with the contention that two enemy aliens brought into the United States involuntarily by the government were not subject to the immigration law and thought the point so clearly settled against them by the present immigration statute that he disposed of it by citing United States ex rel. Ling Yee Suey v. Spar, 2 Cir., 149 F.2d 881, and nothing more.

  6. United States v. Reimer

    103 F.2d 777 (2d Cir. 1939)   Cited 14 times
    Asserting that "the exercise of a discretionary power conferred by implication" is not reviewable by the courts