§

In re Ordaz-Gonzalez

Interim Decision #3845 (B.I.A. 2015)
In re Ordaz-Gonzalez

23 Cited authorities

  1. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

    519 U.S. 337 (1997)   Cited 2,473 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term “employees” carries a different meaning in different sections of Title VII

  2. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

    529 U.S. 120 (2000)   Cited 1,510 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress had not yet empowered the FDA to regulate tobacco products

  3. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.

    486 U.S. 281 (1988)   Cited 792 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute

  4. Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine

    537 U.S. 51 (2002)   Cited 332 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Coast Guard's decision not to regulate propeller guards did not impliedly pre-empt petitioner's tort claims

  5. Negusie v. Holder

    555 U.S. 511 (2009)   Cited 216 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Fedorenko's rule that voluntariness is irrelevant to culpability with respect to the DPA's persecutor bar need not be applied to the analogous INA persecutor bar

  6. F. Hofpmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S. A.

    542 U.S. 155 (2004)   Cited 210 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding domestic effects exception does not apply where "price-fixing conduct significantly and adversely affects both customers outside the United States and customers within the United States, but the adverse foreign effect is independent of any adverse domestic effect"

  7. In re Cardelucci

    285 F.3d 1231 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 130 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a debtor is solvent, the creditors are entitled to receive post-petition interest at the legal rate under a chapter 11 plan of reorganization

  8. Popa v. Holder

    571 F.3d 890 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 75 times
    Holding that a notice of deportation hearing sent by regular mail to the last address provided by an individual satisfies the requirements of due process

  9. Abdisalan v. Holder

    774 F.3d 517 (9th Cir. 2014)   Cited 37 times
    Holding that a BIA decision remanding some claims for relief to an IJ for further proceedings is not a final order of removal and does not trigger the 30–day period for filing a petition for review

  10. Cortez-Felipe v. INS

    245 F.3d 1054 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 55 times
    Holding that the IJ and BIA lack authority to review discretionary decisions regarding when and whether to initiate removal proceedings

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,732 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  12. Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229a   Cited 6,296 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”

  13. Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status

    8 U.S.C. § 1229b   Cited 5,088 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”

  14. Section 1229 - Initiation of removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229   Cited 1,346 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing service by mail

  15. Section 1254 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1254   Cited 1,130 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing suspension-of-deportation eligibility

  16. Section 1003.14 - Jurisdiction and commencement of proceedings

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.14   Cited 483 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that removal proceedings commence "when a charging document is filed with the Immigration court"