§
In re O-J-O

30 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,037 times   505 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"

  2. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,395 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous

  3. INS v. Chadha

    462 U.S. 919 (1983)   Cited 1,250 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there was "adequate Art. III adverseness" because the executive branch determined that a federal statute was unconstitutional and refused to defend it but simultaneously continued to abide by it

  4. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.

    486 U.S. 281 (1988)   Cited 793 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute

  5. Brown v. Gardner

    513 U.S. 115 (1994)   Cited 496 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the statute, as then in force, contained no requirement of fault

  6. Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance

    489 U.S. 561 (1989)   Cited 265 times
    Holding that creditors were not required to exhaust the Federal Home Loan Bank Board's administrative claims procedure before bringing suit against a federal bank

  7. Demarest v. Manspeaker

    498 U.S. 184 (1991)   Cited 226 times
    Holding that prisoners who testify in federal court are entitled to witness fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1821, even though “prisoners are technically ‘produced’ under a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, rather than summoned by a subpoena”

  8. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha Wang

    450 U.S. 139 (1981)   Cited 298 times
    Holding that where allegations are "unsupported by affidavit" they cannot support a motion to reopen because this would constitute a circumvention of the affidavit requirement in the regulations

  9. INS v. Phinpathya

    464 U.S. 183 (1984)   Cited 245 times
    Holding that thirty-two-year-old statute must still be given its plain meaning

  10. INS v. Rios-Pineda

    471 U.S. 444 (1985)   Cited 188 times
    Holding that the BIA may discount evidence of seven years' presence in its assessment of eligibility for suspension when presence was maintained through meritless appeals

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,759 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  12. Section 1254 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1254   Cited 1,130 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing suspension-of-deportation eligibility