In re L-A-C

21 Cited authorities

  1. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

    519 U.S. 337 (1997)   Cited 2,478 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term “employees” carries a different meaning in different sections of Title VII
  2. Shrestha v. Holder

    590 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 1,735 times
    Holding that adverse credibility determinations must be based on "specific and cogent reasons" supported by "specific instances in the record that support a conclusion that the factor undermines credibility."
  3. INS v. Bagamasbad

    429 U.S. 24 (1976)   Cited 773 times
    Holding that the BIA is "not required to make findings on issues the decision of which is unnecessary to the results [it] reach[es]."
  4. Aden v. Holder

    589 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 894 times
    Holding that the court reviews only the BIA decision where the BIA wrote its own decision and did not adopt the immigration judge's decision
  5. Ren v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

    648 F.3d 1079 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 426 times
    Holding that the plain language of the statute shows that the applicant was entitled to notice and an opportunity to corroborate
  6. Ladha v. I.N.S.

    215 F.3d 889 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 304 times
    Holding that an IJ may not require corroborative evidence from an otherwise credible applicant
  7. Liu v. Holder

    575 F.3d 193 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 214 times
    Holding that "the alien bears the ultimate burden of introducing such evidence without prompting from the IJ"
  8. Zhi v. Holder

    751 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 2014)   Cited 163 times
    Holding that the IJ's suspicions about the petitioner's type of visa were speculation because the IJ "never questioned [the petitioner] on the matter" or sought "an explanation that might have clarified the matter"
  9. Chukwu v. Attorney General

    484 F.3d 185 (3d Cir. 2007)   Cited 172 times
    Holding that IJ "failed to take into account relevant and persuasive evidence that would not only explain the alleged inconsistencies, but would also support [the petitioner's] allegations of . . . persecution."
  10. Rui Yang v. Holder

    664 F.3d 580 (5th Cir. 2011)   Cited 93 times
    Determining that a petitioner's argument to this court that the IJ abused its discretion by failing to grant a continuance was not exhausted by petitioner's statement to the BIA that he might have known to provide certain evidence if he had the benefit of lawyer
  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,407 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  12. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,465 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"
  13. Section 1231 - Detention and removal of aliens ordered removed

    8 U.S.C. § 1231   Cited 7,826 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that once petitioner's removal order was reinstated, he was no longer eligible for "relief" in the form of adjustment of status-even if he could obtain a Form I-212 waiver
  14. Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229a   Cited 6,311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”
  15. Section 1003.29 - Continuances

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.29   Cited 655 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing continuances
  16. Section 1208.2 - Jurisdiction

    8 C.F.R. § 1208.2   Cited 75 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Limiting withholding proceedings to a determination of eligibility for "withholding or deferral of removal," and noting that all parties are barred from "raising or considering any other issues"