§
In re Garcia-Linares

17 Cited authorities

  1. Fedorenko v. United States

    449 U.S. 490 (1981)   Cited 455 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Government carries a heavy burden of proof in a proceeding to divest a naturalized citizen of his citizenship" because "loss [of citizenship] can have severe and unsettling consequences"

  2. Monet v. I.N.S.

    791 F.2d 752 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 84 times
    Holding that an alien who procured permanent resident status by concealing his ineligibility had not been "lawfully admitted for permanent residence"

  3. Matter of Longstaff

    716 F.2d 1439 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 67 times
    Holding that the petitioner was not lawfully admitted because he was an “alien afflicted with psychopathic personality,” which made him inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182

  4. Yeung v. I.N.S.

    76 F.3d 337 (11th Cir. 1995)   Cited 32 times
    Finding that allowing section 212(h) waivers to excludable but not deportable aliens was unconstitutional

  5. Castillo-Felix v. Immig. Naturalization Serv

    601 F.2d 459 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 53 times
    Holding that aliens who "are here for a temporary purpose" yet intend to remain in the country "violate the terms of their admission and are no longer here lawfully"

  6. Perez-Rodriguez v. I.N.S.

    3 F.3d 1074 (7th Cir. 1993)   Cited 24 times
    Affirming BIA's interpretation of its own regulation under the substantial deference standard of review

  7. Biggs v. I.N.S.

    55 F.3d 1398 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 8 times

    No. 93-70832. Argued and Submitted August 3, 1994. Decided May 24, 1995. Ann E. Benson, Anchorage, AK, for petitioner. Alexander H. Shapiro, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. CANBY, Circuit Judge: Julieta Vitug Biggs petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision finding her deportable and

  8. Oloteo v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    643 F.2d 679 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 18 times
    Holding Congress "plainly, unequivocally and unambiguously" meant to apply the five-year limitations period to rescission only

  9. Lai Haw Wong v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    474 F.2d 739 (9th Cir. 1973)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that a "mistaken admission conferred no status, permanent resident or otherwise"

  10. Lopez-Telles v. Immigration and Nat. Service

    564 F.2d 1302 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that "[i]mmigration judges are creatures of statute" and that, under Ninth Circuit law, "the immigration judge is without discretionary authority to terminate deportation proceedings so long as enforcement officials of the INS choose to initiate proceedings against a deportable alien and prosecute those proceedings to a conclusion"

  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,407 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,754 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  13. Section 1255 - Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for permanent residence

    8 U.S.C. § 1255   Cited 2,846 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Listing classes of nonimmigrants, such as students and tourists

  14. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,155 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  15. Section 1181 - Admission of immigrants into the United States

    8 U.S.C. § 1181   Cited 170 times
    Requiring "a valid unexpired visa" or other entry document for admission

  16. Section 11.71.030 - Misconduct involving a controlled substance in the third degree

    Alaska Stat. § 11.71.030   Cited 8 times

    (a) Except as authorized in AS 17.30, a person commits the crime of misconduct involving a controlled substance in the third degree if the person (1)[Repealed, Sec. 138 ch 4 FSSLA 2019.] (2) delivers any amount of a schedule IVA, VA, or VIA controlled substance to a person under 19 years of age who is at least three years younger than the person delivering the substance; (3) possesses any amount of a schedule IA or IIA controlled substance (A) with reckless disregard that the possession occurs (i)